The ten most cited papers published in EuJAP according to Google Scholar (UPDATE 10/23/2021)

Here are the ten most cited papers published in EuJAP since its inception in 2005 according to Google Scholar (via Publish and Perish):

1. French, Steven and Kerry McKenzie. 2012. Thinking outside the toolbox: Towards a more productive engagement between metaphysics and philosophy of physics. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 8, 1: 42-59. https://hrcak.srce.hr/92844

91 citations (Scopus: 38, WoS: 32)

2. Devitt, Michael. (2007). Referential descriptions and conversational implicatures. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3, 2: 7-32. https://hrcak.srce.hr/93209

80 citations (Scopus: 36, WoS: 27)

3. Neale, Stephen. 2007. Heavy hands, magic, and scene-reading traps. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3, 2: 77-132. https://hrcak.srce.hr/93214

62 citations (Scopus: 33, WoS: 28)

4. Mele, Alfred. 2006. Self-deception and delusions. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 2, 1: 109-124. https://hrcak.srce.hr/91611

57 citations (Scopus: 13, WoS: 12)

5. Floridi, Luciano. 2007. In defence of the veridical nature of semantic information. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3, 1: 31-41. https://hrcak.srce.hr/93198

54 citations (Scopus: 32, WoS: 18)

6. Beebee, Helen and Nigel Sabbarton-Leary. 2010. Are psychiatric kinds real? European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 6, 1: 11-27. https://hrcak.srce.hr/63453

47 citations (Scopus: 23, WoS: 14)

7. Bach, Kent. 2007. Referentially used descriptions: A reply to Devitt. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3, 2: 33-48. https://hrcak.srce.hr/93210

38 citations (Scopus: 14, WoS: 13)

7. Thornton, Tim. 2010. Psychiatric explanation and understanding. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 6, 1: 95-111. https://hrcak.srce.hr/63458

36 citations (Scopus: N/A, WoS: 4)

8. Price, Carolyn. 2006. Affect without object: Moods and objectless emotions. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 2, 1: 49-68. https://hrcak.srce.hr/91607 

35 citations (Scopus: 16, WoS: 12)

9. Lenman, James. 2005. The saucer of mud, the Kudzu vine and the uxorious cheetah: Against neo-Aristotelian naturalism in metaethics. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1, 2: 37-50. https://hrcak.srce.hr/91123 

27 citations (Scopus: 11, WoS: 8)